RTP Engineering Guide
RTP vs Steel & GRP Pipe
RTP is not automatically better than steel or GRP. The right choice depends on pressure, temperature, fluid, route, installation method, external loads, qualification requirements and whole-life cost. This guide sets out where each pipe family fits and what must be checked before selection.

Comparison by selection criterion
| Criterion | RTP | Steel | GRP / FRP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | Low; easier handling and transport in coils | High; lifting and support are significant | Lower than steel but rigid and usually jointed in sections |
| Corrosion resistance | Thermoplastic liner and jacket resist many corrosive media | Requires coating, lining or material selection | Generally good, but resin/liner compatibility must be confirmed |
| Flexibility | Spoolable; follows routes with fewer joints, subject to bend radius | Rigid; bends and fittings required | Rigid; route and support design required |
| Joint count | Long coils reduce field joints; end connections remain critical | Many joints in long routes unless welded | Joints depend on pipe system and installation method |
| Temperature | Limited by liner, reinforcement and jacket; project-specific | Can cover high-temperature duties with suitable grade | Resin-dependent; verify service temperature |
| Pressure | Depends on reinforcement schedule and design qualification | High pressure capability with established codes | Design-specific; pressure class and joint system must match |
| External damage | Jacket protects reinforcement; rocky ground and third-party interference need assessment | Robust but corrosion coating can be damaged | Good compressive strength but impact and point loading need care |
| Installation speed | Fast where long coils and suitable equipment are available | Depending on welding, coating and heavy lifting | Depending on jointing, curing and support works |
| Repair / reuse | Can be recoiled and reused in suitable applications; repair method must be qualified | Repair by welding or clamps; reuse is limited | Repair is system-specific; reuse is limited |
| Qualification | Pipe, fitting and installation system need project-specific qualification | Mature codes and standards available | Mature standards for many applications; joint and liner details matter |
When RTP is a strong candidate
When another pipe family may be better
Very high temperature, fire exposure, heavy external loads, high surge pressure or projects governed by established steel codes may favor steel. Corrosion protection and joint design still need to be addressed.
Large-diameter rigid systems, severe external loads, certain chemical duties or projects already standardized on GRP may favor GRP/FRP. Jointing, curing and support requirements differ from RTP.
If the fluid attacks the liner, the temperature exceeds the qualified range, the bend radius cannot be respected or a qualified fitting/installation system is unavailable, RTP may not be suitable.
This page is a selection guide, not a design approval. Final material selection, pressure rating, fittings, installation and testing must follow the project specification and qualified product data.
Compare the system, not just the pipe
Send the pressure, temperature, fluid, route and installation constraints. BENK can help define the RTP production scope and the points that need qualification.
